Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

3

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Australian Insurers Under Fire for Steep Premium Increases

30 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

In recent times, Australian insurance companies have come under intense scrutiny due to substantial increases in premiums, even as they report record profits. This trend has raised concerns among consumers and policymakers alike, prompting calls for enhanced transparency and competition within the industry. - read more

Rising Insurance Costs in Northern Australia Despite Reinsurance Efforts

30 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

Homeowners in Northern Australia are confronting significant increases in insurance premiums, even after the implementation of the federal government's cyclone reinsurance pool aimed at reducing costs in cyclone-prone regions. This development raises questions about the effectiveness of current measures and the ongoing challenges in making insurance affordable for residents in high-risk areas. - read more

Lack of Transparency in Insurance Premium Increases Concerns Consumers

30 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

Australian consumers are increasingly facing substantial hikes in their insurance premiums, often with little to no explanation from their providers. This lack of transparency has led to growing frustration and calls for greater accountability within the insurance industry. - read more

AIA Australia's New Partnerships to Encourage Cycling Among Members

30 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

AIA Australia, a prominent life, health, and wellbeing insurer, has announced strategic partnerships with global fitness company Peloton and premium cycling brand Specialized. These collaborations aim to motivate AIA Vitality members to adopt more active lifestyles by providing significant discounts on cycling equipment. - read more

Click for more Insurance News