Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Zurich's Acquisition of ClearView Wealth Gains ACCC Approval

05 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has granted approval for Zurich Financial Services to acquire ClearView Wealth, a move that signifies a notable consolidation within the Australian insurance industry. This acquisition is poised to reshape the competitive landscape, with potential implications for policyholders and the broader market. - read more

Addressing Human Factors in Rising Australian Truck Insurance Claims

04 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Gallagher's recent guidance for Australia's heavy vehicle sector identifies fatigue, inattention, distraction, and inappropriate speed as major contributors to truck incidents and related insurance claims. This analysis is based on recent crash data and regulatory expectations, highlighting the need for comprehensive risk management strategies within the transport industry. - read more

Hostplus and MetLife Extend Partnership to Strengthen Member Insurance Offerings

03 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Hostplus, a leading Australian superannuation fund, has announced the extension of its group insurance partnership with MetLife Australia until June 2028. This strategic move aims to enhance the insurance benefits available to Hostplus members, reflecting the fund's commitment to providing comprehensive and cost-effective coverage. - read more

Nautilus Marine Insurance Celebrates 21 Years with New Brand Identity and Team Expansion

03 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Nautilus Marine Insurance, a leading provider in Australia's marine insurance sector, has marked its 21st anniversary by unveiling a refreshed brand identity and expanding its team with strategic appointments. This evolution underscores the company's commitment to growth and its dedication to serving the marine community. - read more

Click for more Insurance News