Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation
Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
A traveler who faced a canceled flight due to the flight crew reaching their legal working hour limits will only receive partial reimbursement for his expenses.
This ruling came from an official complaints authority.
The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.
However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.
The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".
Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.
AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.
“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,†noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.â€
However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.
Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.
“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,†AFCA concluded.
This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
Australia’s mandatory climate-related financial disclosure regime is moving from policy discussion into practical reporting, and consultants who support sustainability, governance, risk, data, finance or transformation projects should pay close attention. The rules initially apply to larger entities, but their impact is likely to spread through procurement, due diligence and supply chain expectations. - read more
Australia’s latest building approvals commentary has again highlighted a difficult reality for the construction sector: the national housing task is ambitious, but the project pipeline remains uneven. Industry groups have pointed to approvals volatility, planning delays and capacity constraints as continuing barriers to lifting housing supply at the pace governments want. - read more
NSW’s move to redesign the way emergency services are funded has put business insurance affordability back in focus. For personal trainers, bootcamp operators and small studio owners, the issue is more practical than political: when statutory charges are added to premiums, cover can become harder to maintain at the level a growing fitness business actually needs. - read more
The latest monitoring of Australia’s cyclone reinsurance pool has again highlighted a key reality for households and small businesses in cyclone-exposed regions: government-backed premium relief can help, but it does not remove the need to check whether cover is suitable, affordable and realistically sized for the risk. - read more
Small businesses can face liability claims from customers, clients, employees, products, advice, services and day-to-day operations. This guide explains common liability risks in Australia, how insurance can form part of a risk management strategy, and practical steps that may help business owners assess, document and manage those risks. - read more
Professional indemnity and public liability insurance protect small businesses against different types of claims. Understanding the difference can help you assess whether your risks relate mainly to advice and professional services, physical injury and property damage, or both. - read more
Environmental liability can affect how Australian businesses plan projects, manage operations, train staff and arrange insurance. This guide explains the main types of environmental liability, the regulatory issues businesses may need to consider, and practical ways to manage environmental risks without treating insurance as a substitute for compliance. - read more
A certificate of currency is commonly requested as proof that an Australian business holds current liability insurance. Here's what it usually shows, what it does not prove, and when contractors, trades and small businesses may be asked to provide one. - read more
Start Here !
Knowledgebase
Deductible: The amount you must pay out-of-pocket for expenses before your insurance company covers the remaining costs.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.