Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Suncorp Enhances Financial Resilience with AU$2.4 Billion Reinsurance Agreement

12 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Suncorp, a leading Australian insurer, has recently secured a substantial reinsurance agreement valued at AU$2.4 billion over a five-year period. This strategic move is designed to bolster the company's financial resilience and stability in the face of increasing natural hazard costs and a competitive insurance market. - read more

APRA Enforces AU$2 Million Capital Add-On for Sovereign Insurance Australia

12 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has recently imposed an additional AU$2 million capital requirement on Sovereign Insurance Australia (SIA). This decision comes in response to identified deficiencies in SIA's risk management framework and operational risk management practices. - read more

Mecon Enhances Construction Insurance Coverage to $120 Million

12 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

In a significant development for Australia's construction industry, Mecon, a specialist in construction insurance, has announced an increase in its underwriting capacity. Effective from March 10, 2026, Mecon now offers coverage up to $120 million for single projects under its material damage and public liability policy sections. This marks a substantial rise from the previous limit of $50 million. - read more

Mirabelle Unveils Lloyd's-Backed Insurance for Australia's Renewable Energy Sector

12 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Mirabelle Underwriting, a specialist in construction and engineering insurance, has launched a new product tailored for renewable energy operations in Australia. This initiative, backed by Lloyd's capacity, aims to address the specific risks associated with the rapidly expanding renewable energy sector. - read more

Click for more Insurance News