Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Life Insurers Under Scrutiny for Rising Delays in Claim Payments

14 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent findings from the Life Insurance Code Compliance Committee (Life CCC) have revealed a concerning 67% increase in violations related to delayed income protection and Total and Permanent Disability (TPD) claim payments by Australian life insurers. This surge in breaches has left many policyholders facing financial uncertainty during already challenging times. - read more

Addressing Australia's Life Insurance Underinsurance Crisis: Calls for Regulatory Change

14 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Australia's life insurance industry is currently grappling with a significant underinsurance gap, described by industry leaders as a 'perfect storm' of challenges. This situation arises from a combination of social, economic, and regulatory factors that have led to decreased engagement with life insurance products, particularly among younger Australians. - read more

Australian Government Unveils $27 Million Drought Resilience Fund

14 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

In response to ongoing drought conditions affecting various regions, the Australian government has introduced a $27 million funding package designed to enhance the resilience of farmers and rural communities against future droughts and extreme weather events. This initiative underscores the government's commitment to supporting the agricultural sector in mitigating the impacts of climate variability. - read more

InsurABLE's New Model Aims to Revolutionize Drought Insurance for Farmers

14 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

InsurABLE, a company specializing in agricultural insurance solutions, has unveiled a groundbreaking model designed to offer Australian farmers financial protection against the adverse effects of drought. This initiative comes at a time when climate variability poses significant challenges to the agricultural sector. - read more

Click for more Insurance News