Liability Insurance :: News
SHARE

Share this news item!

Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation?w=400

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

A traveler who faced a canceled flight due to the flight crew reaching their legal working hour limits will only receive partial reimbursement for his expenses.
This ruling came from an official complaints authority.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Rate this article

0 Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Insurance News

Netstrata Proceedings Put Strata Insurance Governance Back Under the Microscope
Netstrata Proceedings Put Strata Insurance Governance Back Under the Microscope
18 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori
NSW Fair Trading’s criminal proceedings against Network Strata Services Pty Ltd, trading as Netstrata, have pushed strata governance and insurance transparency back into the national spotlight. The regulator alleges the company and its director and licensee in charge breached statutory obligations connected with strata scheme management in New South Wales, including alleged failures around conflicts of interest, undisclosed financial benefits and information provided to the regulator. - read more
Broker Disclosure Debate Puts Small Business Questions Back on the Table
Broker Disclosure Debate Puts Small Business Questions Back on the Table
18 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori
A fresh dispute over the proposed Insurance Brokers Code of Practice has sharpened the focus on transparency for Australian small businesses. Industry figure John Trowbridge has criticised gaps in the draft code, particularly around whether brokers should disclose commissions and other remuneration to all clients, not only those captured by narrower product or client categories. - read more
AFCA Income Protection Decision Highlights a Hidden Risk for Variable Earners
AFCA Income Protection Decision Highlights a Hidden Risk for Variable Earners
18 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori
A recent Australian Financial Complaints Authority decision has put a spotlight on a detail that can be easy to overlook: how an income protection policy defines income. In the case, a policyholder receiving payments under an employer-arranged group income protection policy argued that regular sales commissions should be counted when calculating his pre-disability income. - read more
Broker Transparency Debate: What Personal Trainers Should Watch
Broker Transparency Debate: What Personal Trainers Should Watch
18 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori
A fresh dispute over Australia’s insurance broking standards has put transparency back in the spotlight for small business policyholders, including personal trainers, fitness instructors and studio operators. On 17 July 2026, several consumer and strata owner groups withdrew from consultation on the National Insurance Brokers Association’s rewritten Insurance Brokers Code of Practice, arguing that industry self-regulation does not go far enough on conflicted payments and commission disclosure. - read more


Business Insurance Articles

The Impact of Environmental Liability on Australian Business Operations
The Impact of Environmental Liability on Australian Business Operations
In today's ever-evolving business landscape, the significance of environmental sustainability and legal accountability is increasingly paramount. Australian enterprises, in particular, are encountering a growing need to understand and manage environmental liability. This reality not only influences corporate image but also carries substantial financial and legal ramifications. - read more
The Role of Insurance in Protecting Your Small Business Assets
The Role of Insurance in Protecting Your Small Business Assets
In the bustling world of small businesses, the phrase 'expect the unexpected' captures the essence of entrepreneurship. While you can plan for success, unforeseen risks are always lurking around the corner. That's where the importance of insurance comes into play. It acts as a safeguard, protecting the lifeblood of your business against potential perils. - read more
Understanding Product Liability Insurance in Australia: A Business Owner's Guide
Understanding Product Liability Insurance in Australia: A Business Owner's Guide
As a business owner in Australia, navigating the complexities of protecting your company is crucial, with product liability insurance being an essential aspect to consider. This type of insurance is designed to shield businesses from financial losses that may arise if a product they manufacture, supply, or sell causes harm to a consumer or damages property. - read more
The Essential Guide to Liability Insurance for Freelancers
The Essential Guide to Liability Insurance for Freelancers
Liability insurance is a type of coverage designed to protect you from claims arising out of injuries or damages to other people or property. For freelancers, who often juggle multiple projects and clients, liability insurance can offer a safety net that reduces financial risk and instability. - read more


Start Here !
Start here!
Cover Amount:
Postcode:

All quotes are provided obligation-free by a participating broker from our national referral partner network. We respect your Privacy.


Knowledgebase
Grace Period:
A time period after the premium is due during which an insurance policy remains in force even if the premium has not yet been paid.