Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

ASIC Calls on Insurers to Enhance Cyber Security in Response to AI Threats

07 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has issued a stark warning to the insurance sector, emphasising the urgent need to strengthen cyber defences in light of escalating threats posed by artificial intelligence (AI). In a recent open letter, ASIC Commissioner Simone Constant highlighted that the advent of advanced AI technologies has fundamentally altered the cyber threat landscape, necessitating immediate and decisive action from insurers. - read more

Comprehensive All-Risk Insurance Now Available for Large-Scale Australian Farms

07 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

In a significant development for Australia's agricultural sector, Harland Green, a newly established Lloyd's coverholder, has unveiled an all-risk farm insurance package specifically designed for large commercial farming operations. This initiative aims to address the complex and evolving needs of the agricultural industry by offering comprehensive coverage that encompasses various aspects of farm operations. - read more

Strategic Insurance Planning Essential for Australian Farmers Facing Rising Premiums

07 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

With Australian farm incomes under pressure and insurance premiums rising by up to 40% in some regions, agricultural leaders are urging producers to move away from a 'set and forget' mentality. In today's climate, being strategic with your insurance is no longer just a recommendation-it is a vital business necessity. - read more

NRMA's Exit from Farm Insurance: What It Means for Australian Farmers

07 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Urgent Update for Australian Farmers: NRMA Exits Farm Insurance Market-Here’s Your Trusted Alternative - read more

Click for more Insurance News