Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Insurers Sound Alarm on AI-Driven Cyber Threats

23 May 2026: Paige Estritori

In the rapidly evolving digital landscape, Australian insurers are raising concerns that artificial intelligence (AI)-driven cyber threats are advancing at a pace that outstrips current market pricing models. This development poses significant challenges for the insurance industry, particularly for tradespeople and small business owners who rely on comprehensive coverage to safeguard their operations. - read more

Aviso WA Strengthens Presence with Wray Insurance Acquisition

23 May 2026: Paige Estritori

In a strategic move to bolster its service offerings, Aviso WA has announced the acquisition of Wray Insurance, a well-established insurance brokerage in Western Australia. This acquisition is set to enhance Aviso WA's capabilities and expand its client base, providing more comprehensive insurance solutions to tradespeople and small business owners in the region. - read more

Surge in Mental Health Claims Challenges Australia's Income Support System

23 May 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent data indicates a substantial increase in mental health-related claims, exerting considerable pressure on Australia's income support safety net. This trend underscores the urgent need for systemic reforms to address the growing demand for mental health support and the sustainability of income protection mechanisms. - read more

Australian Life Insurers Support Review of Life Insurance Code of Practice

23 May 2026: Paige Estritori

The Council of Australian Life Insurers (CALI) has announced an independent review of the Life Insurance Code of Practice, a move welcomed by industry stakeholders aiming to bolster consumer trust and protections. This review signifies a proactive step towards ensuring that the Code remains relevant and effective in addressing the evolving needs of policyholders. - read more

Click for more Insurance News