Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

CHU Introduces Cyber Coverage in Residential Strata Insurance

14 May 2026: Paige Estritori

In response to the escalating cyber threats targeting strata communities, CHU Underwriting Agencies has expanded its residential strata insurance policies to include cyber protection. This enhancement provides coverage of up to $50,000 for losses resulting from social engineering fraud, a prevalent form of cybercrime where perpetrators impersonate trusted contacts to manipulate payment instructions. - read more

CHU Expands Strata Insurance Capacity to Support Larger Developments

14 May 2026: Paige Estritori

CHU Underwriting Agencies has announced a significant increase in its single risk capacity, raising the limit to $690 million from the previous $300 million. This substantial enhancement enables CHU to better support larger residential and commercial strata developments across Australia. - read more

CHU's 2025 Report Shows Stability in Strata Insurance Premiums Amid Climate and Regulatory Shifts

14 May 2026: Paige Estritori

CHU, Australia's leading strata insurance underwriting agency, has released its 2025 State of the Strata Market report, providing a comprehensive analysis of the current state of the industry. The report offers valuable insights into premium movements, the impact of weather events, regulatory developments, and emerging risks affecting strata insurance. - read more

ACCC Deepens Investigation into IAG's Proposed RAC Insurance Acquisition

14 May 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has intensified its examination of Insurance Australia Group's (IAG) proposed acquisition of RAC Insurance, moving the process into a Phase 2 review. This decision underscores the regulator's concerns about the potential impact on competition within Western Australia's insurance market. - read more

Click for more Insurance News