Liability Insurance :: News
SHARE

Share this news item!

AFCA Upholds Fair Evaluation in Insurance Claim Dispute

AFCA Upholds Fair Evaluation in Insurance Claim Dispute

AFCA Upholds Fair Evaluation in Insurance Claim Dispute?w=400

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has directed MetLife to re-evaluate a policyholder’s income protection claim, focusing on justified interpretations of mental health exclusions.

In a case brought to attention, the claimant, who secured his coverage via superannuation, applied for a $9300 monthly policy intended for a two-year coverage span back in March 2020.

The claimant's struggle began in August 2019 when his general practitioner declared him medically unfit for work due to "significant psychological distress," primarily catalyzed by workplace bullying.

As a recourse, the individual took personal leave in August followed by paternity leave in October of the same year. Although he resumed work in October 2020, he had to suspend his professional engagements again by December.

In September 2021, the claimant submitted a request for income protection benefits, citing an adjustment disorder diagnosed with mixed anxiety and depression as the reason inhibiting his capacity to work.

However, MetLife rejected the claim in July 2022, accusing the claimant of inaccurately representing his medical history. The insurance provider argued that the applicant falsely stated he hadn’t been “diagnosed with or sought medical advice or treatment” for psychological issues at the time of application.

MetLife asserted that the applicant already exhibited psychological distress, hindering his work capability long-term, and had they known, the policy would not have been issued. They determined his stress related symptoms equated “to a psychological condition.”

The claimant countered, maintaining he neither identified with a history of psychological ailments during his application process, nor would a typical person in his context.

AFCA elaborated, saying although the complainant experienced "significant stress in 2019," ordinary perception does not always align stress with a psychological or clinical mental health condition. The inquiry focused on awareness of any conditions at the time, not diagnosis existence.

AFCA highlighted that the treating GP did not insist on mental health assessments commonly expected when symptoms emerge, and the sole "treatment" employed was voluntarily steering clear of the work environment, a decision lacking a formal diagnosis.

They elucidated that “Even if the answers given were not actually true (because with the benefit of hindsight the complainant was in fact suffering from a psychological or mental health condition), the panel accepted a reasonable person in the circumstances would also have reached the same belief as the complainant did.”

Following the conclusion, AFCA mandates MetLife to process and revisit the claimant’s submission and communicate the outcome to Hostplus, the coverage trustee, within a 60-day frame. The original content was reported by the Australian Financial Review.

Published:Friday, 1st Nov 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Heightened Road Risks as Holiday Travel Meets Freight Surge
Heightened Road Risks as Holiday Travel Meets Freight Surge
15 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori
As the Australian summer holidays approach, a significant increase in road traffic is anticipated, coinciding with peak freight activity. This convergence raises concerns about heightened road risks, prompting insurers and transport specialists to issue warnings to motorists. - read more
Rising Collision Risks Challenge Australian Fleet Operators
Rising Collision Risks Challenge Australian Fleet Operators
15 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori
Australia's transport and haulage sector is currently navigating a period marked by an uptick in motor collision claims, posing significant challenges for fleet operators nationwide. This trend underscores the necessity for enhanced risk management and insurance strategies to safeguard operations and maintain profitability. - read more
NTARC Report Highlights Key Factors in Major Truck Crashes
NTARC Report Highlights Key Factors in Major Truck Crashes
15 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori
The National Truck Accident Research Centre (NTARC) has released its latest Major Incident Investigation Report, shedding light on the predominant causes of significant truck crashes across Australia. The findings underscore the critical need for targeted interventions to enhance road safety within the transport industry. - read more
IAG Enhances Profit Projections Post-RACQ Insurance Integration
IAG Enhances Profit Projections Post-RACQ Insurance Integration
15 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori
Insurance Australia Group (IAG) has revised its annual profit forecast upward by $100 million, attributing this positive adjustment to the recent acquisition of RACQ Insurance. The company now anticipates a reported insurance profit ranging between $1.55 billion and $1.75 billion for the current financial year, an increase from the previous estimate of $1.45 billion to $1.65 billion. - read more


Business Insurance Articles

Public Liability Insurance Claims: What to Expect and How to Prepare
Public Liability Insurance Claims: What to Expect and How to Prepare
When it comes to navigating the complex waters of insurance, understanding public liability insurance claims is crucial for businesses and individuals alike. Public liability insurance serves as a safeguard, protecting against the financial repercussions that arise from accidents or injuries that occur on your premises or through your operations. In this introductory section, we will delve into the essence of public liability insurance and underline its significance. - read more
Freelancer or Employee? Understanding the Difference and the Liability Implications
Freelancer or Employee? Understanding the Difference and the Liability Implications
The contemporary business landscape in Australia is witnessing a significant shift towards the gig economy, with a growing number of professionals opting for the flexibility and autonomy that freelancing offers. This trend has not only revolutionized the way work is performed but has also introduced new dynamics in the legal distinctions between freelancers and traditional employees. - read more
The Importance of a Custom Risk Management Plan: A Guide for Australian Entrepreneurs
The Importance of a Custom Risk Management Plan: A Guide for Australian Entrepreneurs
In the fast-paced world of entrepreneurship, the only constant is change, and with change comes the inherent realm of the unknown – risk. Australian entrepreneurs, much like their international counterparts, operate in dynamic environments where unpredictability is a staple. However, the unique economic, legal, and environmental aspects of Australia demand a more localized understanding of these risks. Acknowledging this unpredictability is the first step towards mitigating potential threats to one's business venture. - read more
The Essential Guide to Liability Insurance for Freelancers
The Essential Guide to Liability Insurance for Freelancers
Liability insurance is a type of coverage designed to protect you from claims arising out of injuries or damages to other people or property. For freelancers, who often juggle multiple projects and clients, liability insurance can offer a safety net that reduces financial risk and instability. - read more


Start Here !
Your free liability insurance quote comparison starts here!
Cover Amount:
Postcode:

All quotes are provided free and without obligation by a specialist from our national broker referral panel. See our privacy statement for more details.


Knowledgebase
Indemnity:
A legal principle that stipulates that insurance policies should restore the insured to the financial position they were in before the loss.