Liability Insurance :: News
SHARE

Share this news item!

AFCA Upholds Fair Evaluation in Insurance Claim Dispute

AFCA Upholds Fair Evaluation in Insurance Claim Dispute

AFCA Upholds Fair Evaluation in Insurance Claim Dispute?w=400

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has directed MetLife to re-evaluate a policyholder’s income protection claim, focusing on justified interpretations of mental health exclusions.

In a case brought to attention, the claimant, who secured his coverage via superannuation, applied for a $9300 monthly policy intended for a two-year coverage span back in March 2020.

The claimant's struggle began in August 2019 when his general practitioner declared him medically unfit for work due to "significant psychological distress," primarily catalyzed by workplace bullying.

As a recourse, the individual took personal leave in August followed by paternity leave in October of the same year. Although he resumed work in October 2020, he had to suspend his professional engagements again by December.

In September 2021, the claimant submitted a request for income protection benefits, citing an adjustment disorder diagnosed with mixed anxiety and depression as the reason inhibiting his capacity to work.

However, MetLife rejected the claim in July 2022, accusing the claimant of inaccurately representing his medical history. The insurance provider argued that the applicant falsely stated he hadn’t been “diagnosed with or sought medical advice or treatment” for psychological issues at the time of application.

MetLife asserted that the applicant already exhibited psychological distress, hindering his work capability long-term, and had they known, the policy would not have been issued. They determined his stress related symptoms equated “to a psychological condition.”

The claimant countered, maintaining he neither identified with a history of psychological ailments during his application process, nor would a typical person in his context.

AFCA elaborated, saying although the complainant experienced "significant stress in 2019," ordinary perception does not always align stress with a psychological or clinical mental health condition. The inquiry focused on awareness of any conditions at the time, not diagnosis existence.

AFCA highlighted that the treating GP did not insist on mental health assessments commonly expected when symptoms emerge, and the sole "treatment" employed was voluntarily steering clear of the work environment, a decision lacking a formal diagnosis.

They elucidated that “Even if the answers given were not actually true (because with the benefit of hindsight the complainant was in fact suffering from a psychological or mental health condition), the panel accepted a reasonable person in the circumstances would also have reached the same belief as the complainant did.”

Following the conclusion, AFCA mandates MetLife to process and revisit the claimant’s submission and communicate the outcome to Hostplus, the coverage trustee, within a 60-day frame. The original content was reported by the Australian Financial Review.

Published:Friday, 1st Nov 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Allianz Australia Penalised for Misleading Travel Insurance Information
Allianz Australia Penalised for Misleading Travel Insurance Information
30 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori
In a significant ruling, Allianz Australia Insurance and its subsidiary, AWP Australia, have been fined a total of $16.8 million for providing misleading information about their travel insurance products. The Supreme Court of New South Wales found that between 2016 and 2018, the companies misrepresented the extent of coverage available to consumers, leading to potential misunderstandings about policy benefits. - read more
Allianz Partners Highlights Risks of Travelling Uninsured
Allianz Partners Highlights Risks of Travelling Uninsured
30 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori
Recent research conducted by the Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) and the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) has unveiled a concerning trend: approximately 14% of Australian travellers embark on international journeys without any form of travel insurance. This statistic has prompted Allianz Partners to urge Australians to reconsider the importance of securing adequate coverage before travelling abroad. - read more
Surge in Medical Claims Among Australian Travellers Highlights Importance of Comprehensive Insurance
Surge in Medical Claims Among Australian Travellers Highlights Importance of Comprehensive Insurance
30 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori
In 2024, medical incidents emerged as the leading cause of travel insurance claims among Australian travellers, accounting for more than 40% of all claims handled by nib Travel. This trend underscores the critical importance of securing comprehensive travel insurance to mitigate the financial risks associated with medical emergencies abroad. - read more
Allianz Australia Penalised $16.8 Million for Misleading Conduct
Allianz Australia Penalised $16.8 Million for Misleading Conduct
30 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori
In a significant regulatory action, Allianz Australia and its subsidiary, AWP Australia, have been fined $16.8 million for making false and misleading statements. This penalty was imposed following an investigation by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), underscoring the critical need for transparency and honesty in the insurance sector. - read more


Business Insurance Articles

Public Liability Insurance Claims: What to Expect and How to Prepare
Public Liability Insurance Claims: What to Expect and How to Prepare
When it comes to navigating the complex waters of insurance, understanding public liability insurance claims is crucial for businesses and individuals alike. Public liability insurance serves as a safeguard, protecting against the financial repercussions that arise from accidents or injuries that occur on your premises or through your operations. In this introductory section, we will delve into the essence of public liability insurance and underline its significance. - read more
The Cost of Public Liability Coverage: Is It Worth It?
The Cost of Public Liability Coverage: Is It Worth It?
Public liability insurance is a crucial safety net for both businesses and individuals, providing protection against the financial fallout from claims of injury or damage that your business operations might cause to third parties. This type of insurance is designed to cover legal and compensation costs, safeguarding you from unexpected financial burdens. - read more
Understanding Product Liability Insurance in Australia: A Business Owner's Guide
Understanding Product Liability Insurance in Australia: A Business Owner's Guide
As a business owner in Australia, navigating the complexities of protecting your company is crucial, with product liability insurance being an essential aspect to consider. This type of insurance is designed to shield businesses from financial losses that may arise if a product they manufacture, supply, or sell causes harm to a consumer or damages property. - read more
The Essential Guide to Liability Insurance for Freelancers
The Essential Guide to Liability Insurance for Freelancers
Liability insurance is a type of coverage designed to protect you from claims arising out of injuries or damages to other people or property. For freelancers, who often juggle multiple projects and clients, liability insurance can offer a safety net that reduces financial risk and instability. - read more


Start Here !
Your free liability insurance quote comparison starts here!
Cover Amount:
Postcode:

All quotes are provided free and without obligation by a specialist from our national broker referral panel. See our privacy statement for more details.


Knowledgebase
Subrogation:
An insurance carrier may reserve the "right of subrogation" in the event of a loss. This means that the company may choose to take action to recover the amount of a claim paid to a covered insured if the loss was caused by a third party.