Liability Insurance :: News
SHARE

Share this news item!

AFCA Upholds Fair Evaluation in Insurance Claim Dispute

AFCA Upholds Fair Evaluation in Insurance Claim Dispute

AFCA Upholds Fair Evaluation in Insurance Claim Dispute?w=400

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has directed MetLife to re-evaluate a policyholder’s income protection claim, focusing on justified interpretations of mental health exclusions.

In a case brought to attention, the claimant, who secured his coverage via superannuation, applied for a $9300 monthly policy intended for a two-year coverage span back in March 2020.

The claimant's struggle began in August 2019 when his general practitioner declared him medically unfit for work due to "significant psychological distress," primarily catalyzed by workplace bullying.

As a recourse, the individual took personal leave in August followed by paternity leave in October of the same year. Although he resumed work in October 2020, he had to suspend his professional engagements again by December.

In September 2021, the claimant submitted a request for income protection benefits, citing an adjustment disorder diagnosed with mixed anxiety and depression as the reason inhibiting his capacity to work.

However, MetLife rejected the claim in July 2022, accusing the claimant of inaccurately representing his medical history. The insurance provider argued that the applicant falsely stated he hadn’t been “diagnosed with or sought medical advice or treatment” for psychological issues at the time of application.

MetLife asserted that the applicant already exhibited psychological distress, hindering his work capability long-term, and had they known, the policy would not have been issued. They determined his stress related symptoms equated “to a psychological condition.”

The claimant countered, maintaining he neither identified with a history of psychological ailments during his application process, nor would a typical person in his context.

AFCA elaborated, saying although the complainant experienced "significant stress in 2019," ordinary perception does not always align stress with a psychological or clinical mental health condition. The inquiry focused on awareness of any conditions at the time, not diagnosis existence.

AFCA highlighted that the treating GP did not insist on mental health assessments commonly expected when symptoms emerge, and the sole "treatment" employed was voluntarily steering clear of the work environment, a decision lacking a formal diagnosis.

They elucidated that “Even if the answers given were not actually true (because with the benefit of hindsight the complainant was in fact suffering from a psychological or mental health condition), the panel accepted a reasonable person in the circumstances would also have reached the same belief as the complainant did.”

Following the conclusion, AFCA mandates MetLife to process and revisit the claimant’s submission and communicate the outcome to Hostplus, the coverage trustee, within a 60-day frame. The original content was reported by the Australian Financial Review.

Published:Friday, 1st Nov 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

TAL's Health Sense Plus Now Covers Income Protection Policies
TAL's Health Sense Plus Now Covers Income Protection Policies
19 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori
In a significant development for policyholders, TAL has expanded its Health Sense Plus program to encompass income protection (IP) policies. This initiative, effective from August 8, 2025, aims to incentivise proactive health management by offering premium discounts to clients who engage in preventative health checks. - read more
New Legislation Prohibits Life Insurers from Using Genetic Test Results
New Legislation Prohibits Life Insurers from Using Genetic Test Results
19 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori
The Australian government has enacted legislation prohibiting life insurers from using the results of genetic tests to refuse coverage or increase premiums. This landmark decision aims to eliminate genetic discrimination and encourage individuals to undergo potentially life-saving genetic testing without fear of financial repercussions. - read more
Markel Insurance Expands into Australian Marine Market with New Leadership
Markel Insurance Expands into Australian Marine Market with New Leadership
19 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori
Markel Insurance has announced the appointment of Tim Wills as Head of Marine for Australia, marking a significant expansion into the country's marine insurance sector. Based in Sydney, Wills will spearhead the introduction of Markel's marine products, starting with marine cargo insurance. - read more
Pelagic Risk Services Strengthens Marina Support with Gold Sponsorship
Pelagic Risk Services Strengthens Marina Support with Gold Sponsorship
19 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori
Pelagic Risk Services, a specialist marine insurance broker, has elevated its commitment to the marina industry by upgrading from Silver to Gold Sponsorship with the Marina Industries Association (MIA). This move underscores Pelagic's dedication to supporting marinas across Australia through enhanced financial contributions and the provision of exclusive risk management resources. - read more


Business Insurance Articles

The Cost of Public Liability Coverage: Is It Worth It?
The Cost of Public Liability Coverage: Is It Worth It?
Public liability insurance is a crucial safety net for both businesses and individuals, providing protection against the financial fallout from claims of injury or damage that your business operations might cause to third parties. This type of insurance is designed to cover legal and compensation costs, safeguarding you from unexpected financial burdens. - read more
Professional Indemnity vs Public Liability: What's the Best Choice for Your Small Business?
Professional Indemnity vs Public Liability: What's the Best Choice for Your Small Business?
As a small business owner, understanding the intricacies of liability insurance is pivotal to safeguarding the fruit of your hard work. Insurances such as professional indemnity and public liability are not just safety nets; they are vital components that can mean the difference between bouncing back and closing down following unforeseen legal hurdles. - read more
How to Lower Public Liability Insurance Premiums Without Sacrificing Coverage
How to Lower Public Liability Insurance Premiums Without Sacrificing Coverage
In the ever-evolving landscape of Australian commerce, business insurance stands as a crucial bulwark, safeguarding enterprises against unforeseen financial perils. Recognizing this, our in-depth exploration begins with an overview of the monumental role business insurance plays for Australian companies, both large and small. It's a cornerstone for risk management, providing business owners with peace of mind as they navigate the intricacies of their industries. - read more
The Role of Insurance in Protecting Your Small Business Assets
The Role of Insurance in Protecting Your Small Business Assets
In the bustling world of small businesses, the phrase 'expect the unexpected' captures the essence of entrepreneurship. While you can plan for success, unforeseen risks are always lurking around the corner. That's where the importance of insurance comes into play. It acts as a safeguard, protecting the lifeblood of your business against potential perils. - read more


Start Here !
Start here!
Cover Amount:
Postcode:

All quotes are provided free and without obligation by a specialist from our national broker referral panel. See our privacy statement for more details.


Knowledgebase
Insurance Underwriter:
An insurance company, a financial institution that sells insurance.