Uninsured Driver Denied Compensation in Dispute with QBE
Uninsured Driver Denied Compensation in Dispute with QBE
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has ruled in favour of QBE Insurance in a case where an uninsured driver attempted to secure compensation following a collision involving a fire truck.
The incident occurred when the QBE-insured driver paused at an intersection to allow a fire truck to pass, leading to the uninsured driver impacting their vehicle.
The uninsured motorist, disputing QBE's decision to hold him responsible and requiring payment for damages, sought redress through AFCA. He claimed the QBE-insurer's customer triggered the incident by stopping abruptly, without warning, following the fire truck's activation of sirens and lights.
Despite lacking dashcam footage, AFCA reviewed a Queensland Fire Department statement suggesting the distraction and subsequent collision were foreseeable due to the fire truck's presence at a blind corner. Although acknowledging that the QBE customer was potentially negligent for stopping suddenly without adequate warning, AFCA maintained the road rules require drivers to maintain a safe distance to prevent such accidents.
The adjudication concluded that a sufficient following distance was lacking, which could have otherwise allowed the uninsured driver to avert the collision, rendering the complaint unsubstantiated for coverage of his damages. Consequently, the tribunal found him responsible for a portion of the crash alongside the QBE-insured driver.
The ruling bars the uninsured from receiving compensation for his vehicle damage, legal fees, or money paid to QBE, citing jurisdiction limits. Yet, it mandated QBE to issue a $500 compensation for originally misleading the uninsured driver with incorrect statements regarding cost bearing.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
Recent Australian insurance and small business risk commentary has again highlighted lithium-ion battery fires as a practical hazard for workplaces that rely on rechargeable equipment. For beauty salons, skin clinics, nail studios and mobile beauticians, the issue is not limited to obvious items such as laptops or phones. Many everyday tools, including cordless clippers, LED devices, payment terminals, tablets, portable speakers, torches and cleaning equipment, may depend on rechargeable batteries. - read more
Recent insurance industry commentary has again highlighted the affordability challenge facing Australian policyholders, with premium pressure linked to natural hazard exposure, higher repair costs, reinsurance conditions, claims inflation and state-based charges. While much of the public debate focuses on households, the same forces can flow through to small trade businesses that rely on public liability, tools, vehicles, workshop contents and income-related cover to keep operating. - read more
The latest industry attention on Australia’s Cyclone Reinsurance Pool is a useful reminder that affordability reform is only one part of the strata insurance equation. The pool was designed to reduce the cost pressure created by cyclone risk, particularly across northern Australia, where residential strata schemes can face difficult renewal conditions because of wind, rain, storm surge and ageing building infrastructure. - read more
A fresh review of Australia’s cyclone reinsurance pool has put insurance access and affordability back in the spotlight for communities and small businesses across northern Australia. The pool was designed to reduce pressure on premiums for cyclone and cyclone-related flood damage by giving insurers access to government-backed reinsurance. - read more
Welcome to the complex world of running a small business in Australia where navigating through liability risks is as crucial as managing daily operations. This article is crafted to illuminate why every Australian small business needs liability coverage — a shield to protect against potential financial catastrophes. - read more
Public liability insurance is designed to help protect a business when it is found legally responsible for injury or property damage suffered by a third party because of its operations. If an incident occurs, the quality of your documentation can make a major difference to how clearly the claim is assessed. - read more
Professional indemnity and public liability insurance protect small businesses against different types of claims. Understanding the difference can help you assess whether your risks relate mainly to advice and professional services, physical injury and property damage, or both. - read more
Liability insurance is not compulsory for every Australian business, but it may be required by law, licence conditions, contracts, leases, tenders, permits or client agreements. This guide explains where requirements commonly arise and how to check what applies to your business. - read more
Start Here !
Knowledgebase
Whole Life Insurance: A type of life insurance that provides coverage for the insured's entire lifetime, with a savings component that builds cash value.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.