Red Sea Unrest: Insurer Denies Cruise Cancellation Claim

2

The cruise, initially booked for the previous October, was cancelled due to "ongoing unrest." While the holidaymaker received a credit voucher for the cruise, he had already altered his plans and incurred extra expenses. Southern Cross outlined that their policy excludes coverage for disruptions caused by conflicts, such as "acts of foreseeable violence" and "military operations."

The insurer elaborated that the cruise company's reference to regional unrest was tied to Middle Eastern hostilities, namely Israeli military actions in Gaza and Houthi movements targeting ships. The policyholder was forewarned of the non-coverage should regional hostilities impact the cruise itinerary.

Challenging the insurer's position, the claimant approached the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), arguing that the term "unrest" should not fit the war and violence exclusion, stating that cruise vessels were not explicitly targeted. He noted that any violent incidents were mainly concerning cargo ships, suggesting no direct threat to passenger cruises.

AFCA's investigation clarified the circumstances, highlighting that, at the time of cancellation, American naval forces were actively escorting commercial ships in the area, engaging in combat with Houthi forces on occasion. The authority remarked that numerous shipping operators were side-stepping the region due to these threats, which are linked to hostilities involving the Houthis and Israel's warfare in Gaza.

An AFCA ombudsman aligned with the insurer's stance concluded that the regional situation exceeded mere unrest. The presence of US Navy activities was deemed indicative of military operations or foreseeable violence. Continuous Houthi aggressions were classified under foreseeable violence, justifying the insurer's denial of the claim.

Published:Friday, 20th Jun 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

AFCA Upholds Insurance Fraud Ruling Over Disputed Possum Accident 26 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori A motorist's claim that he crashed into a tree to avoid a possum has been denied by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), which supported the insurer's fraud decision. The incident involved the driver crashing his Jeep—insured for over $20,000—on a dimly-lit street, purportedly avoiding the rain-soaked motorway en route to the store. - read more

Code Watchdog Criticises Insurer for Misleading Rejection Letters 24 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori The Life Code Compliance Committee has recently reprimanded a life insurance provider for issuing misleading rejection letters to policy applicants. These letters were deemed 'ambiguous and contradictory' and failed to clearly inform applicants of their review options after being denied coverage. - read more

Insurer Ordered to Pay Full Claim for Confusing Patio Coverage 23 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori A recent ruling mandates that an insurer must fully honor a storm-related claim due to ambiguous policy wording regarding items in open areas. The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) determined that the insurer's restriction on coverage for items in a patio area was unfounded, as the policy's phrasing was not clear. - read more

Australia Sees Dramatic Drop in Catastrophe Losses 23 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori Last year saw Australia's insured catastrophe losses plummet to just $500 million, marking the lowest level since 2004, according to Aon's latest Climate and Catastrophe Insight report. Notably, the Insurance Council of Australia reported no disasters for the year, a situation not seen since 1982. This comes in stark contrast to 2023, when disaster-related insured losses soared to over $3.6 billion. - read more