Homeowner Triumphs in Ground Movement Damage Claim
Homeowner Triumphs in Ground Movement Damage Claim
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
A homeowner's dispute over damage caused by ground movement due to a leaking pipe has received a favorable verdict from the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), promising significant coverage for repairs.
The homeowner noticed cracking in a load-bearing wall on July 8, 2022, and quickly linked the issue to a leaking water main he discovered the next day. He attributed the cracking and additional damage throughout his house to ground movement from the leak.
Independent assessments commissioned by Hollard Insurance presented contrasting views. A plumber observed substantial leakage, resulting in damp conditions and soaking of nearby stumps. He suspected this might have led to slight settlement problems and further cracking within the property, particularly in the kitchen area.
Hollard's engineer, however, inspected the house roughly a month later. Their report downplayed the leaking pipe, chalking up the damage to long-term issues associated with the soil's properties, including seasonal moisture changes and environmental causes. According to the engineer, the cracking damage predated the observed leak and was related to the house's history.
The homeowner highlighted extensive renovation work conducted between 2016 and 2019 to stabilize the foundations of his 1930s-era home, including underpinning and relevelling. He noted the lack of substantial cracking until the sudden appearance of damage in July 2022.
AFCA’s evaluation supported the homeowner’s evidence that the damage in the newer parts of the house was a recent development. Video footage and the plumber's testimony showed significant leakage, undermining the engineer's less critical assessment. AFCA also questioned the conclusiveness of the engineer's floor-level survey.
"While there is a history of movement-related damage, the noted cracking around the extension did not follow this pattern," AFCA determined. According to the authority, the factors cited by the engineer involved gradual, long-term damage, but in this case, the damage seemingly appeared suddenly due to the leaking pipe.
In its final ruling, AFCA concluded that the homeowner's losses likely resulted from an unexpected, sudden release of water. Consequently, Hollard Insurance would be responsible for repairing the assessed damage or covering repair costs. However, unrelated damage not connected to the leak would be excluded from coverage.
The case underscores the importance of independent reviews and cultivates awareness about homeowners' rights amidst damage disputes. AFCA's decision shines a light on their role in ensuring fair evaluations are considered in claim disputes.
This ruling is reported with original insights from an article appearing in Insurance News.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
The latest review of the Life Insurance Code of Practice has put mental health cover at the centre of the national conversation about life insurance, disability insurance and income protection. Independent reviewer Peter Kell has completed his final report, outlining 85 recommendations aimed at improving customer protections, claims handling, communication, vulnerability support and the enforceability of the Code. - read more
APRA’s latest update to the general insurance reinsurance framework may sound like a back-office regulatory change, but it has practical relevance for Australian boat owners watching premiums, excesses and renewal conditions. Published on 7 July 2026, the reforms are designed to give general insurers better access to alternative reinsurance arrangements while keeping safeguards in place for policyholders. - read more
New analysis released by the Insurance Council of Australia has put renewed attention on a major cost pressure for NSW businesses: the emergency services levy, commonly known as the ESL. The levy is currently collected through insurance premiums, meaning businesses that choose to insure their assets can face a higher cost for doing so. - read more
New modelling released on 7 July 2026 has added momentum to the debate over how New South Wales funds emergency services, with analysis suggesting that removing the Emergency Services Levy from insurance premiums could deliver meaningful savings for many households and businesses. The findings, commissioned by the Insurance Council of Australia and prepared by Lateral Economics, support a shift away from loading the cost onto insurance policies and towards a broader property-based funding model. - read more
Public liability insurance is a key consideration for business owners in Australia. This type of insurance helps protect businesses against claims made by third parties for injuries or property damage. But what exactly does it do? In simple terms, public liability insurance covers legal costs and expenses, as well as any damages awarded, if your business is found liable for an incident. - read more
Public liability insurance is a crucial safety net for both businesses and individuals, providing protection against the financial fallout from claims of injury or damage that your business operations might cause to third parties. This type of insurance is designed to cover legal and compensation costs, safeguarding you from unexpected financial burdens. - read more
In the fast-paced world of entrepreneurship, the only constant is change, and with change comes the inherent realm of the unknown – risk. Australian entrepreneurs, much like their international counterparts, operate in dynamic environments where unpredictability is a staple. However, the unique economic, legal, and environmental aspects of Australia demand a more localized understanding of these risks. Acknowledging this unpredictability is the first step towards mitigating potential threats to one's business venture. - read more
Welcome to the complex world of running a small business in Australia where navigating through liability risks is as crucial as managing daily operations. This article is crafted to illuminate why every Australian small business needs liability coverage — a shield to protect against potential financial catastrophes. - read more
Start Here !
Knowledgebase
Moral Hazard: The concept that individuals may take on more risk when they do not bear the full consequences of that risk, often relevant in insurance scenarios.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.